Molecular analysis of brain development and function

Symposium organized by Peter Gruss and Nicole Le Douarin from 14 to 19 juin 2000


Gonzalo ALVAREZ-BOLADO (Max-Planck Institut, Göttingen), Isabelle BACHY (Université Pierre-et-Marie Curie, Paris), Chloé BERTOLUS (C.N.R.S. / Collège de France, Nogent-sur-Marne), Edoardo BONCINELLI (Istituto Scientifico H. San Raffaele, Milan), Vieri FAILLI (Université Pierre-et-Marie Curie, Paris), Donna M. FEKETE (Lilly Hall Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA), Jonas FRISEN (Medical Nobel Institute, Stockholm), Peter GRUSS (Max-Planck Institut, Göttingen), Mamie HALPERN (Carnegie Institution of Washington, Baltimore), Mark HENKEMEYER (University of Texas, Dallas), Chava KALCIEM ((Hadassah Medical School, Jérusalem), Georg KUHN (Université de Regensburg, Allemagne), Nicole LE DOUARIN (C.N.R.S. / Collège de France, Nogent-sur-Marne), Oscar MARIN (University of California, San Francisco), Angela NIETO (Instituto Cajal, Madrid), Antonio SIMEONE (International Institute of Genetics, Naples), Anastassia STOYKOVA (Max-Planck Institut, Göttingen), Clive N. SVENDSEN (University of Cambridge, Grande-Bretagne), David WILKINSON (N.I.M.R., Londres), Wolfgang WURST (MPI für Psychiatrie, Munich).



Recent progress in the field of vertebrate developmental neuro­biology has been made not only in areas which have become clas­sical (pattern formation, neural crest), but also in relatively new subjects, such as the behavioral analysis of mutations affecting CNS development, and the properties of stem cells and how to exploit them to treat disease. Participants in the meeting (“Molecular Analysis of Brain Development and Function”, 14-19 Lune, Tourtour, France) organized by Peter Gruss and Nicole Le Douarin and funded by the Fondation des Treilles, use approaches to devel­opmental biology that reflect this variety of subjects.


Mamie Halpern (Carnegie Institution, Baltimore) discussed some of the early events of patterning of the neural tube that are already initiated during gastrulation. Previous work has shown that the notochord induces the formation of the floor plate and motor neurons in the ventral neural tube, via the signalling molecule sonic hedgehog (shh). However, the analysis of zebrafish mutants that affect notochord and/or floor plate development suggests that earlier events also control the formation of floor plate and motor neurons. For example, shh and the related twhh gene are coexpressed in the shield, the zebrafish equivalent of the “organiser”, that contains precursors for the prechordal mesoderm, notochord and floor plate. Subsequently, the notochord and floor plate express only shh and twhh, respectively. However, in the ntl mutant, in which notochord development is blocked, shh and twhh continue to be co‑ expressed and there is an expansion of the floor plate, consistent with a switch of notochord precursors to a floor plate fate. The floor plate fans to form and shh is not expressed in a mutant of the cyclops gene, that encodes a nodal-related signalling molecule expressed in the shield and the prechordal mesoderm. These defects in cyclops mutants are rescued by injection of RNA to express cyclops in prechordal mesoderm (but not when expressed in notochord), suggesting that this tissue has an important role in induction as it migrates past the presumptive spinal cord. Later in development, cyclops, antivin (a TGFβ-related gene), and the pitx2 transcription factor are expressed in an asymmetric manner, on the left side of the presumptive pineal organ in the dorsal diencephalon. These genes form part of a regulatory cascade in which one-eyed pinheаd (oep), required for nodal signalling, is essential. Bуinjecting oep RNA into oep mutants, early gastrulation defects are rescued, but not the later role in left-right asymmetric gene expression. Intriguingly, this leads to a mispositioning of the normally asymmetric location of the pineal organ, indicating a role in the generation of anatomical asymmetry in the forebrain.

One major theme of the meeting was the role of transcription factors in pattern formation along the anteroposterior and dorsoventral axes in the mouse midbrain and forebrain. Antonio Simeone (IIGB, Milan, and Guys Hospital, London) discussed the relative roles of Otx1 and Otx2 in the specification of the anterior brain. The forebrain, midbrain and anterior hindbrain are missing in Otх2 -/- mutants, whereas Otx1 -/- mutants only have later defects in the telencephalon and еye, and in semicircular canals in the inner ear. Otx2 function is required at early stages in anterior visceral endoderm (AVE) that induces anterior neural tissue, and is subsequently expressed in, and required for, the maintenance of forebrain and midbrain territory. Furthermore, the interface of Otx2 and Gbx2 expression at the presumptive midbrain/hindbrain interface, is required for formation of the isthmic organiser, a signalling centre expressing FGF8 that induces the midbrain and ante­rior hindbrain. Whereas the isthmus forms normally in Otx2 +/­mutants, in Otx1 -/-, Otx2 +/- mutants FGF8 expression shifts anteriorly into the posterior forebrain and fails to become restricted to its normal narrow domain. However, forebrain tissue is not transformed into midbrain, suggesting that Otx gene function is required for the competence to respond to FGF8. These results suggest that Otx1 and Otx2 have at least partly overlapping roles, and that a minimum Otx gene dosage is required for anterior brain development. This raises the question of whether the different phe­notypes of Otx1 and Otx2 mutants reflect divergent biochemical properties of these transcription factors, or differences in their reg­ulation. A “knock-in” of оtx2 to replace Otx1 rescues the late defects in brain development, but have defects in the semicircular canals, suggesting a specialised role of Otx1 in ear development. The converse replacement of Otx2 by Otx1 leads to a failure to maintain the anterior brain. Intriguingly, although the knocked-in Otx1 gene expresses RNA in the AVE and anterior brain, Otx1 protein is only present in the former tissue. Furthermore, a knock-in that inserts exogenous sequences into the 3′ untranslated region of Otx2 RNA, inhibits its translation in the anterior brain but not in the AVE. Taken together, these fîndings reveal that translation is an important level of control of Otx2 gene expression in the brain.

Wolfgang Wurst (Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich) discussed the interactions and roles of genes expressed in the isth­mic organiser. En1 and En2 are expressed on both sides of the isthmus, whereas expression of FGFB and Рax2, and of Wnt1 becomes restricted to reciprocal domains, posterior (midbrain) and anterior (anterior hindbrain) to the isthmus respectively. Analysis of En1/En2, Рax2 and Wnt1 mutants reveals that these genes are mutually interdependent for maintenance of their expression and formation of the midbrain and anterior hindbrain. When the boundary of Otх2 gene expression was shifted posteriorly by gen­erating a knock-in of Otx2 into En1, there was a corresponding posterior ectopic expression of Wnt1 and downregulation of Gbx2. Concommitant with this, there is a deletion of anterior parts of the cerebellum that are derived from the anteriormost part of the hind­brain. Together with other data, these findings show that оtx2 and Gbх2 mutually repress each other and position the isthmus, and that they initiate a network of signalling and transcriptional regu­lation that maintains the organiser and regulates regional fate. It has been assumed that Wnt1 may have a similar role to Wnt genes in other tissues and systems, as a signal that regulates the fate of adjacent cell populations. To test this, the boundary of Wnt1 was shifted posteriorly by creating a knock-in into the En1 gene. Unexpectedlу, it was found that there was a major increase in the size, but not the patterning, of midbrain derivatives, whereas ante­rior hindbrain derivatives were not affected. This larger size was due to an increase in cell proliferation at the time when the endoge­nous Wnt1 gene would normallу be downregulated, but the knocked-in Wnt1 gene expression was maintained. Wnt1, there­fore, has an important role in the control of cell proliferation in the midbrain that requires correct temporal regulation of its expres­sion.

The cerebral cortex has been regarded by some developmental neurobiologists as a last frontier to describe and explain with the tools of molecular biology. Today, it is widelу accepted that cells in the cortical primordium have some information about their pre­sumptive fate, even before being reached by incoming thalamic axons. The data of Edoardo Boncinelli (DIGIT, Milan) reveals that the transcription factor Еmx2 could be part of that informa­tion. Ву means of antibody staining, it can be demonstrated that Еmx2 is expressed in the ventricular layer of the embryonic cortex in a caudo-rostral and latero-medial gradient. This implies an early polarization (and perhaps an early definition of areas) of the cortex before any subcortical axons have reached it. Consistently, in mice deficient in Еmx2 the areal specification is altered, to judge by the expression of markers like Id3, cadherin б and Lamp. In general, the mutant cortex is shifted caudаlly and medially, and its connec­tivity is altered accordingly. An intriguing hint about how Еmx2 could exert its effect is given by the fact, that, this protein can also be found in the nuclei of a peculiar cell population of layer 1 which expresses reelin (Cajal-Retzius cells). The Еmx2 null mutant lacks this population of reelin-expressing layer 1 cells from e14.5 on. The subplate of the mutants is also very reduced, especially at caudal levels (even if Еmx2 is not expressed in the subplate). In these mutants, cortical cells cannot migrate through the subplate (perhaps because of the absence of reelin-containing Cajal-Retzius cells?).

Also expressed in the ventricular layer of the early cortex is the transcription factor Рах6. Anastassia Stoykova (Max Planck Institut, Göttingen) reviewed the evidence that Рах6 has an essen­tial role in the control of the number and differentiation of cortical radial precursors. A novel function for Рах6 is in the delimitation of the telencephalic neuroepithelium at two borders: those between pallium/subpallium and lateral/medial ganglionic eminences. At the second of these, Рах6 appears to limit the ventralizing activity of sonic hedgehog/Nkx2.1. This is similar to what has been reported for the spinal cord, and suggests that Рах6 might be a common modulatory cue for the dorso-ventral patterning and cell specification in the entire neural tube. The defective dorso-ven­tral patterning in the telencephalon of the natural Рах6 mutant Small eye has, as a result, morphological defects in the cortico-striatal border, dysgеnesis of the piriform and lateral cortex and of the amygdala as well as thalamo-cortical and cortico-fugal pathfinding abnormalities. The results suggest also, that in some cortical progenitors, Рах6 might regulate the differentiation of a subpopula­tion cortical precursors, acting upstream transcription factor Ngn2.

Expression studies have suggested that different combinations of POU-III transcription factors are involved in the further partitioning of the basal ganglia neuroepithelium. Oscar Marín (Nina Ireland Laboratory, UCSF) showed results indicating that an increasing number of other genes (including Mash1, Nkx2.1, Emx2) can be added to the list of transcription factors that con-tribute to the subdivision of the telencephalic neuroepithelium into progenitor domains. The origin and specification of striatal interneurons is an ideal model to test this hypothesis. Ву combin­ing injections of DiI and retroviral markers with detection of Nkx2.1 expression on cultured slices of mouse embryonic telen­cephalon, it can be shown that many cells migrating tangentially from the medial ganglionic eminence (MGE) differentiate into interneurons destined to the striatum (and probably to the cortex too). Consistеntly, mice deficient in Mash1, which have a reduced MGE, show a large decrease in cholinergic interneurons in the lat­eral ganglionic eminence (LGE), although the numbers of striatal interneurons expressing NPY are much less affected. Mace deficient in Dlx1 and 2 show something of the opposite effect: reduced stri­atal NPY interneurons, but almost normal numbers of the cholin­ergic variety. The results show how the large variety of transcrip­tion factors, and their combinations, is at the source of the variety of interneurons that can be found in the basal ganglia. If thepro­genitor domains of the neuroepithelium are the beginning of the story, perhaps we can consider behavior as the end towards which brain development is finally oriented.

Gonzalo Alvarez-Bolado (Max Planck Institut, Göttingen) is trying to put together a model that starts with transcription factors in the diencephalon and ends with behavioral alterations. Correct expression of winged helix transcription factor Foxb1 (Fkh5) in a specific population (a subdivision of the zona limitans?) of radial precursors in the diencephalic neuroepithelium 1s essential for the entrance of mammillary axons (hypothalamus) in the dorsal thala­mus. Immediately alter this navigational defect, the lateral and medial mammillary nuclei, source of these axons, are dramatically reduced in size owing to apoptosis. Degeneration of the mammil­lary body is the cause of severe memory problems (anterograde amnesia) in humans affected by Korsakoff syndrome. Data obtained in collaboration with Kostik Radyushkin (Anokhin Institut, Moscow) show that adult Foxb1 mutants score well in a series of experimental paradigms that test for learning abilities (among them fear-conditioning, social transmission of food prefer­ence). The mutants show, however, a very spеcific defect in spatial learning, that can be detected in the Morris Water Maze. This mutation can be a model of how the precise information contained in a gene can affect a number of cellular processes, which affect a whole brain system and are then reflected in behavior.

A further part of the diencephalon is the optic system (еуе stalk, еyeсup and retina), which is partitioned by the action of transcrip­tion factors. Peter Gruss (Max Planck Institute, Göttingеn) dis­cussed recent genetic and molecular evidence that transcription fac­tors Рaх2 and Рах6 inhibit each other to subdivide into optic stalk (Раx2 territory) and retina (Рах6 tеrritory), the limited patch of diencephalic neuroepithelium allocated to the optic primordium. The respective mutant phenotypes are in agreement with this hypothesis: deficiency in Рax2 leads to a reduced and altered optic stalk, while mouse mutant embryos lacking Рах6, do not develop a retina. In addition, the promoters of both transcription factors have binding sites for each other. A key experiment involves Shh, an important regulator of forebrain differentiation, expressed in the ventral midline of the forebrain. Overexpression of Shh in a trans­genic background leads to embryos with a larger Рax2 expression domain (which translates into a longer optic stalk) and a smaller Paх6 expression domain (resulting in a smaller retina). These results suggest that Рaх2 and Рах6 subdivide the optic primordium by competing to regionalize the neuroepithelial patch either as stalk or retina; and that Shh participates in the competition by indirectly activating Рax2 and inhibiting Рах6. Consistеntly, the reported phe­notype of mouse embryos deficient in Shh includes complete absence of optic stalk and one patch of Рах6 expression in the mid­dle of the ventral diencephalon. Injection experiments in Xenopus oocytes show that Vaxl, a transcription factor expressed in the optic stalk, inhibits the expression of Rx, a key retinal differentia­tion regulator. This suggests that a “push-pull” contest between transcription factors could be a general mechanism to regionalize the forebrain neuroepithelium.

In addition to the control of regional and cell type identity dis­cussed in the above talks, the establishment and maintenance of patterns of cellular organisation and neuronal connections requires the regulation of cell and axon movement. The Eph receptors and ephrins are important regulators of cell and axon movement, and Mark Henkemeyer (University of Texas Southwestern) presented data that reveals new aspects of their developmental fonctions. EphB receptors interact with the transmembrane ephrin-B pro-teins, and biochemical and functional studies suggested that each of these components can transduce signals leading to a repulsion response. The analysis of EphBl, EphB2 and EphB3 receptor knockouts indicates that there are defects in the crossing of axons across the midline at a number of locations in the CNS. Whereas, in some cases, the EphB receptor transduces signals required for axonal pathfinding, in others it is acting as a ligand to activate sig­nalling through ephrin-B protein, expressed in axons. In a triple knockout of these three EphB receptors, there is also a defect in the fusion of the dorsolateral neural epithelium to form the neural tube. Furthermore, EphB2/EphB3 null mutants have hypospadia, in which there is a problem in the midline fusion of endodermal cells that normally leads to the separation of the urethra and colon. A similar phenotype is observed after a knock-in in which the intra­cellular domain of ephrin-B2 is replaced with (3-galactosidase, such that it can act as a ligand but cannot transduce signals. Since EphB2 is expressed in endodermal cells at the site of normal fusion, and ephrin-B2 is throughout the epithelium, their interaction seems to promote epithelial fusion. These findings provide impor­tant in vivo evidence for the emerging idea that, in some contexts, Eph receptors and ephrins can mediate adhesion rather than repul­sion. Still further surprises have come from investigation of defects in inner ear fonction in EphB2/EphB3 mutants. Rather than being due to problems in innervation, it was found that EphB2 is required for the function of the secretory epithelium. Eph receptors contain an interaction motif for PDZ domain containing proteins, and it was shown that this couples Eph receptors to aquaporin proteins, that transport water across the plasma membrane.

Other aspects of Eph receptor and ephrin-B function were dis­cussed by David Wilkinson (National Institute for Medical Research, London). Eph receptors and ephrin-B proteins are expressed in complementary segmental domains in the developing hindbrain, and the results of ectopic activation and blocking experiments in zebrafish embryos had suggested a role in preventing mixing between segments. Ву mosaiсly expressing Eph receptor or ephrin-B, it was shown that activation of either component leads to cell sorting within the hindbrain, suggesting that bidirectional responses could occur at the interface between segments. Direct evidence for a role of bidirectional signalling was obtained by analysing cell mixing between a zebrafish animal cap expressing exogenous Eph receptor and an animal cap expressing exogenous ephrin-B. Bidirectional signalling prevented mixing between the cell populations, whereas unidirectional activation of Eph receptor or ephrin-B did not. However, unidirectional activation was suffi­cient to prevent gap junctional communication. Bу structure-func­tion mapping in the animal cap assay, evidence was obtained that signalling through ephrin-B proteins involves both tyrosine phos­phorylation and interactions with PDZ domain proteins, and that these have distinct roles in the restriction of cell intermingling. These findings support a model in which Eph receptor and ephrin ­B activation each lead to a repulsion response, such that bidirec­tional activation at a boundary underlies a mutual repulsion that prevents each cell population invading the other. These molecules maу therefore stabilise hindbrain segments and other tissue domains by preventing cell intermingling, such that thеу form “compartments”, and by restricting cell communication via gap junctions between segments.

Studies in Drosophile embryos have shown that the boundaries between compartments often act as signalling centres that control local patterning. Donna Fekete (Purdue University) discussed evi­dence that such a principle could be involved in generation of the highly complex pattern of the inner ear. A number of genes encod­ing transcription factors, such as Рax2, Soho” and Otx1, are expressed in specific domains along the anteroposterior (AP), mediolateral (ML), and dorsoventral axes of the otic placode and vesicle. Furthermore, ВМР4 is expressed at the boundaries between some of these domains, and the saccule, coclear and endolymphatic duct arise at specific locations in relation to the boundaries. Cell lineage analyses show that there are stereotyped cell movements, and that there is a restriction to mixing across the AP boundary. Taken together with the effects of gene knockouts, these observations support a model in which transcription factors maу act as compartment identity genes, and the boundaries control local patterning. An important aspect of the generation of the highly complex, three dimensional pattern is likely to be the closure of the otic placode to form a vesicle, such that new interfaces will form between distinct domains.

Another important area of developmental neurobiology con­certs the formation, migration and differentiation of neural crest cells. Two talks focused on the question of how the migration of neural crest cells from the dorsolateral neural plate is initiated. Chaya Kalcheim (University of Jerusalem) presented evidence that, in addition being involved in the formation of neural crest, BMP signals induce the delamination and migration of these cells in the trunk. ВМР4 is expressed uniformly along the dorsal neural tube, while its antagonist Noggin is expressed in these cells in a high caudal to 1ow rostral gradient. In the rostral spinal cord (1ow Noggin), neural crest migration has initiated, whereas in the caudal spinal cord (high Noggin), neural crest is still premigratory. Furthermore, application of Noggin, either in vivo or to neural tube explants, inhibits the initiation of migration, whereas exogenous ВМР4 accelerates the onset of migration. It is therefore important to understand how the downregulation of Noggin is controlled, thus allowing BМР4 to induce migration. Вуcarrying out tissue ablation experiments, it was shown that the dorsal somite contains an activity required for the downregulation of Noggin, accounting for the coordination of neural crest migration with the rostral to caudal wave of somitogenesis. Activation of BMP receptors induces the expression of genes, such as rhoB and Cad6B, impli­cated in the morphogenetic movements of delamination and migration, and it was found that Noggin down-regulates the expression of these genes. Noggin also downregulates Wntl expression, and by use of an inhibitor of Wnt function, evidence was obtained that Wnt signalling is required for the delamination of neural crest.

Another key regulator of neural crest delamination and migra­tion was discussed by Angela Nieto (Cajal Institute, Madrid). In the chick embryo, the slug zinc linger gene is the earliest known marker of premigratory neural crest, and previous work implicated it in the control of delamination and migration. The related Snail gene is expressed subsequently in the migrating neural crest in the chick, consistent with the idea that Slug and Snail maу act to initi­ate and maintain migratory behaviour. Surprisingly, it was found that this temporal order is reversed in the mouse, with Snail expressed in prеmigratory neural crest, and Slug in migrating neu­ral crest. A survey of expression in different vertebrate species, found that the pattern observed in the mouse occurs in fish, and that the swap in timing of expression occurred in the lineage lead­ing to reptiles and birds. This finding suggests that Slug and Snail mау have similar targets, and indeed, overexpression of either gene in the neural tube, led to an increase in the number of migrating neural crest cells. Furthermore, overexpression of Snail in epithelial cell lines induces a mesenchymal phénotype, and expression of the endogenous gene has a striking correlation with the invasiveness of tumours. In epithelial cell lies and tumours, E-cadherin express­ion is downregulated in the presence of Snail, suggesting that loss of this adhesion molecule is an important step in the epithelial to mesenchymal transition. This regulatory relationship is direct, since Snail is a transcriptional repressor that binds to regulatory sequences of the E-cadherin gene.

A major question concerning the development of neural crest, is how their differentiation into a wide variety of derivatives is con­trolled. Nicole Le Douarin (Institut d’Embryologie Cellulaire et Moleculaire, Nogent-sur-Marne) discussed evidence for plasticity and restrictions in the fate of neural crest. Neural crest from spe­cific axial levels gives rise to parasympathetic ganglia, whereas at other levels, thеy give rise to sympathetic ganglia. The results of transplantation experiments show neural crest cell populations are ut committed to these fates prior to migration, but rather their fate depends upon anteroposterior location. A related issue is whether, at the single cell level, there are totipotent stem cells and/or more restricted pluripotent precursors, and clonal analysis provides evidence for both classes of cells. Insights into factors reg­ulating the differentiation of cells into melanocytes has come from the anаlysis of the roles of endothelin3 (ЕT3) and endothelin receptor B. A requirement in melanocyte differentiation is demon­strated by the observation that, mutations in these genes are responsible for coat colour defects (as well as deficiencies in the enteric nervous system). When neural crest cells in culture are treated with ЕТЗ, there is a major increase in the number of melanocytes at late stages, but no change in the number of neurons. Furthermore, in clonal analyses, it was found that there is an increase in the number of clones giving rise to melanocytes, glial cells or both, but not in glial/neuronal or glial/neuronal/melanocyte clones. Remarkably, if differentiated pigment cells are cultured in the presence of ET3, both pigment and glial cells are produced. Similarly, Schwann cells transdifferentiate to form some pigment cells in the presence of ЕТЗ. Taken together, these findings show that ЕТЗ arts specifically on melanocytes, glial cells, and their inter­mediate precursor, but nit on other intermediate precursors or totipotent neural crest. Furthermore, ЕТЗ can induce differentiated cells to revert to an intermediate glial/melanocyte precursor phe­notype.

One of the most exciting, and rapidly growing, fields in devel­opmental neurobiology is that of neural stem cells in the embry­onic and adult brain. Neurons are continuously generated in cer­tain regions of the central nervous system. There neurons derive from multipotent, self-renewing neural stem cells. The first obser­vations about adult neurogenesis were made in the cortical sub-ventricular zone, which produces neurons for the olfactory bulb. This system, together with the dentate gyrus, which is known to produce granular cells in the adult, has become a favorite model to Study the properties of adult neural stem cells. Georg Kuhn (University of Regensburg) discussed data indicating that produc­tion of neural cells by these systems can be modulated. Infusion of growth factors like EGF and FGF2 is known to increase neuroge­nesis, and to affect the proportion of neurons to glia formed by the neural stem cells: EGF produces a large increase in the numbers of both neurons and glia, while FGF2 causes a smaller increase in pro­duction, but mostly of neurons. There is evidence that growth fac­tors exert their modulatory effects on neurogenesis through tyro­sine kinase receptors; these would in turf affect the transcription of genes involved in сell proliferation. Favorite suspects are transcrip­tion factors of the E2F family, known regulators of cell cycle pro­gression and cell division. Of the Five members of the family, E2F1 and 2 are expressed in the ventricular and subventricular zone of the brain. Accordingly, mice mutants deficient in E2F1 or in E2F2 (and particularly those deficient in both) show decreased adult neu­ronal proliferation. Selective pharmacological destruction of serotonergic, noradrenergic or cholinergic inputs to adult neurogenetic arcas has differential effects on the number of BrdU-labeled cells found in the neuroepithelium. This intriguing results suggest that afferent inputs to the proliferating arcas differеntially affect the rate of adult neurogenesis.

It has been thought that the differentiation potential of adult stem cells was limited to the cell types characteristic of the organ where thеу appear. Jonas Frisén (Karolinska Institut, Stockholm) has used adult neural stem cells from ROSA26 mice (beta-galac­tosidase-expressing) to demonstrate that adult neural stem cells can generate cells of every germ layer. When adult neural stem cells are cultured together with еmbryoid bodies, many of them differenti­ate into myocytes. Adult neural stem cells (from the ventricle-lin­ing ependyma or from the subventricular layer) can be cultured as clonal aggregates or “neurospheres”. Mouse-derived neurospheres, injected in the amniotic cavity of chick embryos, can incorporate into the embryо and give rise to perfectly differentiated cells in ectoderm-, mesoderm- and endoderm-derived organs. This is also true if the injected neurospheres are clonally formed from one sin­gle ependymal cell. Injection of mouse-derived neurospheres into early mouse blastocysts can give rise to chimeric mouse embryos where beta-galactosidase cells can be found in many organs, always fully differentiated according to the host tissue. Although “blue” cells are also found in the germ fine, it is not known at present if they would be functional. This evidence suggests that adult neural stem cells could have a degree of multipotentiality approaching that of embryoniс stem cells.

Inc step beyond “natural” neurogenesis is the harvesting of embryonic neural stem cells, and their utilization to produce neu­rons in vitro for transplantation, or to test new pharmacological compounds. Clive Svendsen (MRC, Cambridge, UK) discussed recent progress in the development of consistent and reliable protocols to generate in vitro human neurons with the desired phenotypes. If grown on a substrate in the presence of FGF2, cells isolated from the neural tube of early human fetuses can generate neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. Human neural precursor cells expanded in culture for short periods, can be grafted into the striatum of adult rats with lesions of the dopaminergic system, where only occasion ally some of them express tyrosine hydroxylase and can revert the effects of the lesion. This suggests that it is safer to differentiate the human neural precursors in vitro, before transplanting. One possibility would involve “shepherding” the neurons through differentiation pathways leading to the dopaminergic phenotype. Recent data obtained in rodents, however, indicate that rodent neurospheres differentiate more often into those neuronal types characteristic of the region of the neural tube from which the precursors were collected. Therefore, the neural precursors are regionally specified in such a way that they have different phenotypic potential. Consequently, in order to obtain large numbers of dopaminergic cells in vitro, we are better off if we start with hum an neural precursors harvested from the midbrain. This regional specification does not exclude the existence of earlier, non-regionalized stem cells common to the whole neural tube; these could simply divide more slowly and be flooded by more committed precursors. Another important, finding is that neural precursor cells from mouse, rat and human show different requirements for growth in vitro, so that we cannot directly apply what we learn from animal models to the culture of human neurons. Work with hum an cells is essential, if knowledge with eventual clinical applications is to be obtained.

Of course, there is another way to put stem cells to good use: Gene trapping represents a tried and true method to go from embryonic stem cells to the discovery of novel genes. One popular strategy is to electroporate the ES cells, then fish for the trapped genes and classify Chem by sequence. The opposite Strategy consists of generating the mutant mice, analysing the patterns of expression of the reporter and focusing on those gene trap events that show a more interesting distribution. The advantage in this case is that, together with the novel gene, the mutant line is immediately available. Peter Gruss (Max Planck Institut, Göttingen) presented a selection of novel genes obtained by this method. According to the corresponding mutant phenotypes, all of these genes have interest­ing developmental functions. Apaf1 codes for an essential compo­sant of the apoptotic pathway, whose defiсiency leads to over­grown brain and retina, failure to fuse in the midline in the face, and preserved interdigital membranes. The Querkopf mutation defines the gene for a histone acetyltransferase of the MYST fam­ily involved in cortical development. In its absence, the cortical plate is very reduced, which translates in a smaller adult cortex, with a dramatic reduction in GABAergic interneurons and in layer 5 pyramidal cells. HSP90beta is a 90kD heat shock protein expressed ubiquitously, but the effects of whose deficiеncy are lim­ited to the placenta. Mutant trophoblast cells fail to differentiate, leading to placental failure and death of the conceptus.

Developmental neurobiology is progressing at a breathtaking pace. A cell and molecular description of the events leading to neu­ral crest differentiation and brain regionalization seems within reach. Its practitioners are also looking forward to contributing to fields such as behavioral science and the therapy of neurodegener­ative diseases. In this exciting, and rapidly changing, environment, the meeting in the secluded provençal domain of Les Treilles was a particularly welcome occasion to take stock of some of the manу areas of progress.




OpenEdition vous propose de citer ce billet de la manière suivante :
ldiebold (19 juin 2000). Molecular analysis of brain development and function. Les carnets de la Fondation des Treilles. Consulté le 21 juillet 2024 à l’adresse

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search